Sitting inside is not necessarily the way to go. I did, in the
beginning, but when I decided to give my seat to some old lady
that seemed to need it more than me, the bus stopped. Maybe the
driver felt bad about having me standing in his bus. After all,
I probably paid as much for my trip as the rest of the
passengers altogether. So I was offered to sit on the roof. I
was rather sceptical about it, but decided to give it a go. I
soon found there are several advantages to be gained from being
on top:
- You get to sit on your luggage. This means you know where
your luggage is all the time, and you're also fairly sure
that things won't disappear from it. In addition, your
luggage probably makes a softer seat than the seats inside
the bus.
- The view from up there is splendid. As you travel through
the country there will be mountains and ricefields
everywhere, and the best place to see them from is
definitely the roof.
- I imagine sitting on the roof can save your life. The
price to pay for the wonderful views are the steep cliffs next
to the road. Sitting on the roof, you can all the time
keep in mind that "If the bus goes off the road at THAT
side, I can jump off on THIS side", etc. During my stay in
Nepal I read about several major accidents with 40-50
deaths in 20-30 seat buses.
It's not all fun, though. Wear clothes you don't have to worry
about ever getting clean again, as the dust is pretty intense up
there. Also, be sure to hold onto the bus all the time. The
Nepalis don't know how to build roads, so they pay the Indians
to build roads for them. Sadly, the Indians don't know how to
build roads either, so the roads get very, very bumpy. And they
disappear once a year, in the rain season. Anyway, the buses do
between 30 and 40 kilometers per hour on average, and this
combined with the bumpy roads results in a lot of
"turbulence". Your travel insurance probably doesn't cover
"sitting on top of a bus".